Integrated Transport Resource Catalog

Pepustakaan Pusat Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia

Title
CIPP Evaluation Model and Its Effect on E-Learning
Collection Location
Repository PIP Semarang
Edition
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Author(s)
DARUL, PRAYOGA
Subject(s)
URL Dokumen
Classification
Series Title
GMD
Electronic Resource
Language
Publisher
STAi staibulwatan bengkalis
Publishing Year
2024
Publishing Place
Collation
Abstract/Notes
ABSTRACT
One indicator of the quality of educational institutions is the
use of information technology in teaching and learning
activities. E-learning is fundamentally a teaching and learning
activity using internet-based technology. The purpose of this
research is to evaluate teaching and learning activities using elearning.
This
study
utilized
the
CIPP
(Context,
Input,
Process,

Product)
evaluation
model
related
to
e-learning.
The
analysis

technique

used was multiple linear regression using R
Software to see how much effect context and input had on the
learning process and how much effect context and input had
on the learning product. Based on the study results,
Knowledge and understanding of Context component were of
more significant concern since 63 (44.68%) of 141 cadets stated
‘poor’. The average score of knowledge and understanding of
Input component was 41, which was in score interval 33 – 42,
included in the good category. Moreover, the average score of
knowledge and understanding of Process component was 82,
which was in score interval 65 - 84, included in the good
category. Importantly, knowledge and understanding of
Product component was of greater concern since 69 (48.94%)
of 141 cadets showed poor results. Effect size of Context and
Input components on Process was 0.5479 or 54.79%, while the
remaining 45.21% was affected by other factors not examined
in this study. The input component had a significantly more
significant effect on Process component with a significance
level of 0.001 than Context component. Moreover, effect size
of Context and Input components on Product was 0.3303 or
33.03%, while the remaining 66.97% was affected by other
factors not examined in this study. Context component had a
significantly greater effect on Product with a significance level
of 0.001 than Input component.
Specific Detail Info
//repository.pip-semarang.ac.id/3886/